STICKY: DIAL is looking for you to make DIALux better

I really do apologize for the delay in posting to this blog, I have been involved in a blitz of graphic work, photoshoots, and catalog design for my company. :lol: I’m back now and I have a very interesting development for the DIAlux community. During my hiatus, I received an email from Willi Bremecker who is the Team Leader for Sales at DIAL which is the company that produces DIALux. He is asking me, and therefore you the DIALux community as a whole what type of DIALux tutorials we would want. How cool is that!?! 8) I think that this is a tremendous opportunity for us to contribute to a terrific free program that we all use and love so I am asking you now to think about what it is we want and to thoughtfully comment to this post for discussion which I will forward to Mr. Bremecker, hopefully for implementation. As Mr. Bremecker requests in his email, if there are features or lighting calculations that you feel are missing from the program, please comment on those too. Since the number one complaint about DIALux seems to be the lack of tutorials and/or documentation, now is the time for us to get it together and let them know how we feel and what needs to be done to make this the single best lighting calculations program out there.

I am posting Mr. Bremecker’s email to me:

Hello Craig,
my name is Willi Bremecker, I am the Team Leader Sales at DIAL and until
last year I was responsible for the DIALux development as the Team Leader
Software Development. So I read your article with great interest and I am
happy that you like our work. Also the reactions by your readers is
impressive. Of course I could help you with any help for all your
questions. For example the tutorials. What do you need ? Would you like to
have video tutorials or a document with pictures like “My first Project.
My second Project….”?

When we designed DIALux we tried to keep it as simple as possible. During
more than 10 years of development more and more wishes of users and
demands from the market were implemented. Because of this continuous
growth it is no longer as easy to use as it should. So a few years ago we
designed “The guide”. The Icon Bar on the right hand side of DIALux. You
can select what type of design you are going to make, for example interior
or exterior and than you follow the guide from the top to the bottom. Just
click on those Icons and DIALux enables you to do it. The other thing we
had and still have in mind is to keep the right mouse button the most
important feature of the software. If you want to do something with an
object, make a right click on it. The context menu offers those functions
which are available for that object.

The included manual and online help (F1) is describing all the available
functions but I can imagine it is not enough. So tell me, what type of
tutorials and what topics you want to be explained and I will check what I
can do. The next week there is the light and building fair in Frankfurt,
Germany. We will be present in Hall 3.0 booth A80. So for all the
interested guys, just drop in and check out for the latest version.

By the way. Is there anything you are missing for the american market? Any
diagram or value that has to be calculated? Just tell me about your needs.
We are thinking of going to the Lightfair in New York next year. Maybe we
have to prepare something for it.

Regards,

Willi

Kudos to DIAL for looking to the community for feedback and we hope to get you some real positive, useful information real soon.

12 comments May 23, 2008

STICKY: After the tone DIALux

I’m getting lots of traffic due to my DIALux article and I see a lot of search terms that include “DIALux” in them and there is certainly a lot of clicking on outbound links for DIALux but I haven’t heard back from any readers about what they are doing with DIALux, how it’s going, and what they think about DIALux. I’d really like to know, I’m genuinely interested to get some feedback (as I am sure DIALux would too) from you.

Come’on! Post a comment or send me an email and tell us whaaasssuppp! 8)

Click here for all my DIALux-related articles

19 comments May 22, 2008

STICKY: DIALux Tutorial Anyone?

Still getting lots of traffic about DIALux and a lot of comments. Keep them coming, I and the rest of the DIALux community want to hear from you. Has anybody…..and I mean ANYBODY out there stumbled across a tutorial on using DIALux? Probably not but I thought I would ask anyway. Try Googling “dialux tutorial” with the quotes and see what you come up with. A big fat goose egg!

Anybody out there writing a DIALux tutorial or interested in writing one? I’d certainly be interested in, not only documenting and publicizing such an effort here on my blog, but helping out, i.e. contributing to such an effort. Please let me know.

Keep up the comments, we want to here from you even if it’s just to say “Hello! I use DIALux and I like it”.

7 comments May 21, 2008

Another Sketchup & Kerkythea Image

Here is another example of the power of Google Sketchup Pro 6 and Kerkythea as it pertains to lighting. This is an concept OEM LED Undercabinet lighting fixture that my company, International Light Technologies is manufacturing for a customer (the one depicted in the image is an earlier version concept). When you combine the powerful and fast modeling capabilities of Sketchup with the awesome non-biased rendering power of Kerkthea, you have a rather inexpensive but immensely powerful tool for rapid visualization. 8)

Sketchup & Kerkythea Light Fixture Renderings. Image Copyright (c) 2008 International Light Technologies
Click on the thumbnail to see the full size image

Technorati Tags:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 comment May 19, 2008

You mean a daylight planner ISN’T a little book I schedule my appointments in?!?!?

Here is a terrific yet brief article about what exactly daylight planning is and what a daylight planner does as it refers to architecture (not how your family spends April vacation :) . Think of it as a quick primer on the subject. Includes a neat little glossary of commonly encountered terms when dealing with a building’s daylight plan.

Check out the article

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Add comment May 14, 2008

Design Project Organization Software

If you’re a designer who works predominantly on digital projects (graphic designer, illustrator, lighting designer, photographer, etc..) and you have Microsoft Access 2002 or better and are struggling with organizing your projects (as I do frequently), then you might want to checkout the Digital Design Project Manager database from Six Bicks Press. This fantastic piece of software allows you to enter project information, keep track of clients, contacts, digital assets as well as asset license information, deadlines, and more. The software has full reporting, does internal backups, has user preferences, reminders, and way more stuff than I can talk about here and it’s inexpensive! You can pick it up from the Six Bicks website or you can get it cheaper via one of their Ebay auctions.

Add comment May 13, 2008

How LED lighting can save on costs and help the environment

Harking back to a topic I posted earlier on this blog about LED replacement lamps for amusement park rides or lack thereof I thought you might find a recently published article from Funworld Magazine in which I was quoted interesting. Hopefully you find it interesting, I enjoyed being interviewed by Ms. Gable and I think the article illustrates some of the pros and cons of adopting LEDs within the amusement ride industry. Give it a read.

As usual, your comments are appreciated! :)

Click here to read the article on the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions website

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 comments April 20, 2008

Just for a laugh! Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!

Totally unrelated to architectural lighting in any way, shape, or form but good for a laugh. I setup a “HEYMONKEYBRAIN” page where you can go and actually argue/debate back and forth on an issue I thought was most pressing…….Is Elvis Alive or Dead?

This is just one of many funny (or serious) topics you can argue back and forth over. Give it a try…its good as a stress reliever and certainly good for a laugh. :)

Check it out | digg story

Add comment April 19, 2008

Company combines fiber optics and LED technology to create fiber optic fabric and luminious clothing

Let’s chock this next one up to architectural “accessories” lighting, perhaps? Whatever you want to call it, these were neat enough to mention here so make sure you go take a look at these, OK?

LumiGram SARL a French high tech fashion and design company started by the famous fashion designer Jacqueline has come up with a line of table clothes, sculpture, throw pillows, and among other things fashion tops that are all made out of or incorporate arrays of LED illuminated fiber optics creating a shimmery, colorful glow of light. Some are AC powered and others are battery operated (AC powered fashion tops are available as window displays). The table cloths, pillows, and sculptures could be of interest to an architectural lighting designer (perhaps even the clothing if they’re a particularly fashionable lighting designer :) ) working on finishing upscale commercial venues or perhaps a private residence that wants that pulse-pounding dance floor look at night. Swaths of illuminated fiber optic fabric can be used as swags or tapestries.

Anyrate, these are all handmade items that are fun and highly unique and they incorporate two of my favorite things, fiber optics and LEDs. Definitely different. If any of my readers tries any of these, I’d be really interested in a picture or two. Kewl 8)

Click here to checkout their website

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 comments February 26, 2008

Story on LED Replacement Lamps Highlights Need for Standardized Testing Methods

I recently read a story on LEDs magazine about Toronto’s Palace Pier condominium tower becoming the largest residential LED conversion in North America. The Palace Pier is an upscale, 44 floor condo building with spectacular views that the designers wanted to carry over into the interior of the building. They replaced the existing 1300 MR16 halogens with direct MR16 replacement LED modules. The halogens consumed 35 watts of electricity versus 4 watts for the LED replacements. Kudos on being green!

The thing that I found most interesting here is that the contracted company providing the replacement LED fixtures does not put up complete specifications for either of their replacement LED products:  no datasheets, nothing specific. Just a general 300+ lumens for their MR126 replacement product. I question the comparison in brightness between MR16 halogens and the LED replacements. The story just says comparable brightness but when you go to the CRS website, all you see is the 300+ lumens. Ignoring the fact that lumens is not brightness but total light output in all directions as measured in an integrating sphere, 300 lumens isn’t even close to the 1000+ lumens light output you get from a typical 35 watt, 12 VDC MR16 halogen lamp. What I am sure they are referring to is center beam candela, which is a brightness measurement but their website doesn’t have that specification. Perhaps the MR16 halogens they are replacing weren’t particularly bright, a very real possibility but who knows? I’m sure the fixtures were tested, at least by their own eyes, to make sure they were as bright or brighter but the published specs alone don’t bare that out. I am also sure that in this case it is just an oversight but it does lead me to ramble on about something that is all too common in the industry these days: confusing. missing, or misleading specifications.

Unfortunately, beam candela measurements have to take into account the measurement distance and the angle at which the beam is sampled, neither of which needs to be defined in the results. So a manufacturer that took a measurement at 4 feet away from the lamp over a 26 degree sampling angle and only came up with 480 Candela could retake the measurement at 3 feet from the lamp for a 10 degree sampling angle and get a more favorable 950 Candela and publish that as their spec without saying it was measured at 4 feet at a sample angle of 10 degrees. If these were separate manufacturers and separate lamps, how could you make a direct comparison based on 480 candela versus 950 candela without knowing the missing information? You couldn’t, really. Beam candela refers to how bright a narrow beam of light will look to an average human observer at some specific distance away. A lamp such as the replacement lamps used at the Palace, may only output 300 lumens but at a very narrow 15 degree beam angle so the brightness at, lets say 4 feet away may be quite high compared to an MR16 halogen at the same 4 feet with a more impressive 1000 lumen output but with a broader beam angle of 30 degrees. Kind of confusing isn’t it?  One lamp manufacturer may publish their 1000+ lumens as a measure oft their lamps brightness while another may publish 850 Candela as theirs. So which one is brighter? You’d have no clue without actually buying each and testing them both. Errr!

As an LED manufacturer and distributer, I have a real problem with LED lamp manufacturers that do not put up their specifications and when they do, they only put up generalities or use the more confusing numbers such as lumens as an indicator of brightness. This leads to confusion and hurts the industry as a whole. I know of several large companies/institutions that would switch over to LED lighting if the market weren’t full of confusing and misleading numbers. They just won’t take the chance. The DOE, working on standardized testing methods for LED based architectural lighting, has run into this big time with submissions that had stated outputs no where near what the DOE’s testing bore out. Click here to read more about the DOE’s efforts on standardized testing methods for solid-state lighting.

Well I’m not going to go on much further. I said what I wanted to say. I’m not impugning the company in the story. In fact, congratulations to them on their success on this project. I’m merely citing the story as an example of an industry-wide practice that needs to improve if solid-state lighting hopes to make it into every home. :(

Click here to read the full story at LEDs Magazine

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

5 comments January 15, 2008

Previous Posts


Feeds

To all my readers...

Please leave comments on those articles you read and find interesting (there is a little "comments" link at the bottom of each article). I would be very interested to hear your thoughts or perhaps start up a discussion. Thanks to all!

Links

What we're blogging about...

AL Courses and Education architectural lighting Architectural Lighting Industry DIALux General Innovative Lighting Design Just for fun Office Lighting Solid-State Architectural Lighting Tools of the Trade Uncategorized

Article Archives

RSS Check out these great related blogs...

RSS Architectural Lighting News Around The Web

Recent Comments

ezzatbaroudi on STICKY: DIAL is looking for yo…
Hugo Melgar on STICKY: DIAL is looking for yo…
craigbic on STICKY: DIAL is looking for yo…

Find us at...

Help people find this blog!

Add to Technorati Favorites

More information about...

Blog Stats

Spam Comments Blocked